The text creates an opposition between town and country by using words and phrases to position the reader to believe that the country is the better way of living than the town life. He tell's the reader that he'd love to switch lives with Clancy, but he said that Clancy wouldn't suit the office. The writer of this text uses binary opposition to compare the country to the town and in this poem the invited text positions us to believe that the country life is better than the town life.
How is language used to romanticise the outback and degrade the town?
The language has been used in a effective way to romanticise the outback and degrade the town/city, the writer of this text uses binary opposition to highlight the positives of the outback and the negatives of the town. For example the text says "dusty dirty city" in comparison to "bush has friends", this romanticises the idea of the country life and degrades the idea of the town life and it is displayed all throughout the poem.
What is left out? What is privileged?
There are many gaps in this poem, the author has left out the negatives of the country and the positives on the town. This has impacted the poem, and has made the invited reading position the readers to believe that the country is a better place to live than the town is. The other gaps and things that are left out are the townsfolk opinions, in this poem you only get the poets perspective and it is also a male perspective, no women, children or Aborigines are mentioned or their perspectives are heard.